Post by leemsutton on Jul 23, 2005 19:32:47 GMT 1
Steven,
I think the whole of FW is poor to be honest. I now find myself trawling the internet for the information the FW used to supply. They have put the advertising prices up also and by doing this there are very few compnaies advertising in the new machinery section - have a look and compare it to an issue 5 years ago.
The crop section is pretty dismal - we now get far more information sent free from various chemical companies and agronomists. You could say that info from somebody like syngenta is biast towards their products - possibly but when you take the average from all the sources you get some fairly accurate info.
The livestock section is something that I never really look at, but if I wanted some info I buy the Farmers Guardian.
Then the money section with market prices comes through daily from various sources.
The used machinery section has improved because its grown. Soon the FW will be a copy of the Farmers Trader with just used machinery in it.
Lastly as we all already know the web site is now just complete rubbish.
I think some of the articles that FW machinery has written over the last few months have been quite good but there is never enough of them. 5 years ago the magazine was far bigger. They say that they have 70,000 readers - I dont think so as many local guys to us dont even buy it any more and have the Farmers Guardian instead for all round general news.
Profi for me offers far more to read but I dont buy it to get info on crop husbandry.
I think the whole of FW is poor to be honest. I now find myself trawling the internet for the information the FW used to supply. They have put the advertising prices up also and by doing this there are very few compnaies advertising in the new machinery section - have a look and compare it to an issue 5 years ago.
The crop section is pretty dismal - we now get far more information sent free from various chemical companies and agronomists. You could say that info from somebody like syngenta is biast towards their products - possibly but when you take the average from all the sources you get some fairly accurate info.
The livestock section is something that I never really look at, but if I wanted some info I buy the Farmers Guardian.
Then the money section with market prices comes through daily from various sources.
The used machinery section has improved because its grown. Soon the FW will be a copy of the Farmers Trader with just used machinery in it.
Lastly as we all already know the web site is now just complete rubbish.
I think some of the articles that FW machinery has written over the last few months have been quite good but there is never enough of them. 5 years ago the magazine was far bigger. They say that they have 70,000 readers - I dont think so as many local guys to us dont even buy it any more and have the Farmers Guardian instead for all round general news.
Profi for me offers far more to read but I dont buy it to get info on crop husbandry.